A new study from IIASA scientists says seasonally pumped hydropower storage could provide an affordable way to store renewable energy over the long-term, filling a much-needed gap to support the transition to renewable energy
The challenge to find an effective and affordable solution to issues surrounding the long-term storage of renewable energy has been explored by scientists from the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Carrieann Stocks looks at how the institute believes seasonal pumped hydropower storage could offer one such sustainable solution.
Seasonal pumped hydropower storage (SPHS) could be an affordable and sustainable solution to store renewable energy and water on an annual scale, according to new IIASA research.
Compared with other mature storage solutions, such as natural gas, the study, which was published in Nature Communications, shows there is considerable potential for SPHS to provide highly competitive energy storage costs.
“The energy sectors of most countries are undergoing a transition to renewable energy sources, particularly wind and solar generation,” said IIASA postdoc Julian Hunt, the study lead author.
“These sources are intermittent and have seasonal variations, so they need storage alternatives to guarantee that the demand can be met at any time. Short-term energy storage solutions with batteries are underway to resolve intermittency issues, however, the alternative for long-term energy storage that is usually considered to resolve seasonal variations in electricity generation is hydrogen, which is not yet economically competitive.”
The science behind seasonal pumped storage
Seasonal pumped hydropower storage means pumping water into a deep storage reservoir, built parallel to a major river, during times of high water flow or low energy demand.
When water is scarce or energy demand increases, stored water is then released from the reservoir to generate electricity.
The new study is the first to provide a global, high-resolution analysis of the potential and costs for SPHS technology.
In their analysis, researchers assessed the theoretical global potential for storing energy and water seasonally with SPHS, focusing on the locations with the highest potential and lowest cost.
They also analysed different scenarios where the storage of energy and water with SPHS could be a viable alternative.
The study included topographical, river network and hydrology data, infrastructure cost estimation, and project design optimisation, to identify technically feasible candidate sites.
Study highlights estimated costs of seasonal pumped storage
The study shows that water storage costs with SPHS plants vary from 0.007 to 0.2 $/m3, long-term energy storage costs vary from 1.8 to 50 $/MWh and short-term energy storage costs vary from 370 to 600 $/KW of installed power generation capacity, considering dam, tunnel, turbine, generator, excavation and land costs.
The estimated world energy storage potential below a cost of 50 $/MWh is 17.3 PWh, which is approximately 79% of the world electricity consumption in 2017.
The researchers found that significant potential exists for SPHS around the world, in particular in the lower part of the Himalayas, Andes, Alps, Rocky Mountains, northern part of the Middle East, Ethiopian Highlands, Brazilian Highlands, Central America, East Asia, Papua New Guinea, the Sayan, Yablonoi and Stanovoy mountain ranges in Russia, as well as several other locations with smaller potential.
“Concerns about the intermittency and seasonality of wind and solar can be valid, but are also sometimes exaggerated,” said IIASA researcher Edward Byers, a study coauthor.
“This study demonstrates that there is an extremely high potential for SPHS to be used across much of the world, providing a readily-available, affordable, and sustainable solution to support the transition to sustainable energy systems and overcome real and perceived barriers to high shares of renewable generation.”
Potential environmental concerns
The study also addresses some of the potential environmental concerns related to hydropower. Because SPHS reservoirs are deep and constructed parallel to, rather than within the course of a river, the environmental and land use impacts can also be up to 10 to 50 times smaller than traditional hydropower plants.
Hunt said: “With the need for a transition to a more sustainable world with lower CO2 emissions, renewable energies and energy storage will play a major role in the near future. Given the vast untapped and cheap potential of SPHS, it will soon play an important role in storing energy and water on a yearly basis.”