Table 3: Peak power demand by regional network, April 2002-December 2003
Network |
Provinces* |
Trend (GW) |
% change in period |
Min-Max in period |
% gain |
Dongbei |
Heiliongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning |
20-21.5 |
7.5 |
20-27 |
35 |
Huabei |
Nei Mongol, Shanxi Hebei, Beijing |
32-35 |
9.4 |
32-4 |
25 |
Shandong |
Shandong |
13.5-14.8 |
9.6 |
13.5-17.6 |
30.4 |
Sichuan |
Sichuan |
6.7-7.8 |
16.4 |
6.7-10.5 |
56.7 |
Nanfang |
Yunnan, Guizhou, Guangxi, Guangdong |
29-34 |
17.2 |
29-40 |
37.9 |
Xibei |
Qinghai, Gansu, Shaanxi, Ningxia |
11-13 |
18.2 |
11-16 |
45.5 |
Huazhong |
Henan, Hubei, Hunan, Jiangxi |
2-26 |
18.2 |
2-35 |
59.1 |
Fujian |
Fujian |
6.5-8.0 |
23.1 |
6.5-9.2 |
41.5 |
Huadong |
Jiangsu, Shanghai, Zhejiang |
38-48 |
26.3 |
38-57 |
50 |
Chongqing |
Chongqing |
2.2-3 |
36.4 |
2.2-4.4 |
100 |
* Not shown: Xinjiang, Tibet, Anhui, Tianjin, Hong Kong. Italic indicates provinces severely affected by hydro power generation shortages
Source: Institute of Energy Economics (IEE), Japan using China Electric Power Information Center (CEPIC) data, and China Electricity Council (CEC)
|